Please visit EF Australia website to see relevant programs, offers and pricing information.

Academics

Boarding Life

Language And Culture

Parents

Alumni

Student Stories

School News

Language Learning

New York

Pasadena

Oxford

Stories from our international boarding schools

Lotta Baalerud ‹ EF Academy Blog

On March 11th, it was time for another lecture in a series of public lectures hosted by the <a href="https://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/members/students/lecture-lists">Oxford Mathematical Institute</a>. The topic of the evening was knot theory. I had heard of this particular branch of mathematics before, but I was still greatly puzzled by how knot theorists could combine maths and knots. Thus, I was eager to hear what the lecturer, Marc Lackenby, a Professor at Oxford University, had to say about the topic.
Simply put, knot theory is the mathematical study of knots. The knots studied in knot theory are the same knots you would expect to find in everyday life. The only way they differ is that the knots studied in knot theory have their ends “glued” together, so that they may not be undone.
The simplest knot is called the unknot, which really isn’t a knot at all, just a ring. As Professor Lackenby put it “From here there are no limits, that we know of, to how many crossings a knot might have, and there exist thousands of different knots with varying level of intricacy.”
Later, he explained how Peter Tait, a Scottish physicist, was the first person ever to describe this level of intricacy in a knot as the knot’s “knottiness.” In 1885 Tait published the first ever knot tables which included knots with up to 10 crossings.
The world’s knot theorists have come a long way since Tait published his tables, and today knot theory is being applied to everyday life in fascinating ways. In his presentation, Professor Lackenby focused on how knot theory is being applied to biology, more specifically genetics.
Every human cell contains when stretched out, about two meters of DNA. For this to fit into one tiny cell, only a couple of micrometers wide, one can imagine that the DNA molecule needs to be exceptionally well curled up.
The replication of DNA is essential in order for cells to divide, and during this process, the big knot of DNA needs to be untangled. This is where knot theory comes into the picture. By understanding knot theory scientists can also better understand how DNA untangles and then coil up again. This is considered valuable knowledge in many professions, especially within medicine.
Overall the lecture was very fascinating and I believe that I now have a much better understanding of both the basics and also the application of knot theory. I highly recommend anyone who is, even remotely, interested in maths to attend one of these <a href="https://www.ox.ac.uk/events-list">public lectures at Oxford University</a>.
It is an excellent way of discovering new areas of maths, and I can guarantee you will be leaving the lecture with an increased passion for mathematics.

On March 11th, it was time for another lecture in a series of public lectures hosted by the Oxford Mathematical Institute. The topic of the evening was knot theory. I had heard of this particular branch of mathematics before, but I was still greatly puzzled by how knot theorists could combine maths and knots. Thus, …

Knot theory: public lecture at Oxford Mathematical Institute - EF Academy Blog

Knot theory: public lecture at Oxford Mathematical Institute ‹ EF Academy Blog

Knot theory: public lecture at Oxford Mathematical Institute

Knot theory public lecture oxford mathematical institute

The Chemistry in Action workshop in London gave 20 of Oxford’s first-year chemistry students the opportunity to explore ideas about the subject outside of the usual course structure, along with over 200 students from other UK schools.
Subject areas included the analysis of crystals, discovering new elements, new ways of looking at the periodic table, and (a real favorite) some very useful tips on how to answer exam questions!
The talk that I enjoyed the most was Kathryn Harkup’s Making the Monster. She discussed concepts from the Mary Shelley book, Frankenstein about mad scientist Victor Frankenstein who pieced together a monster using body parts from dead humans.
In her thrilling talk, she explained to us how a real-life Victor Frankenstein might have built and reanimated his horrifying creature from the book. Not only did Harkup tell us the story she also connected real-life experiments to it.
She explained how scientists in the eighteenth century believed that electricity could provide a spark of life and awaken the dead. On account of this belief, many scientists were obsessed with trying to reanimate humans and other living things, mainly by using electricity.
The eighteenth century was also a time where anatomy became incredibly popular. Because of this and the sudden urge to raise the dead, body parts were so precious that students sometimes paid their tuition fees in hearts, heads, and even whole corpses! The author, Mary Shelley picked up on all of these things and used them as a source of inspiration for her book.
I think it was incredibly fascinating to see how a fictional story like Frankenstein was in fact based on real science experiments. Maybe even more interesting is how we actually use electricity today to provide “a spark of life” through modern-day defibrillators.
The same “spark of life” is what reanimated the Frankenstein creature in Mary Shelley’s book, which I think is pretty incredible considering the fact that defibrillators were not demonstrated until the late 1890s.

The Chemistry in Action workshop in London gave Oxford's first-year chemistry students the opportunity to explore ideas about the subject in real life.

Topics

Lotta Baalerud

All posts from Lotta Baalerud